मी लहान असताना आज्जी मला छान गोष्टि सांगत असे, आज काल मराठी सिरियल च्या स्टोरी सान्गते.
(When I was small, granny would tell me nice stories. Now a days she tells stories from Marathi soaps.)
Read this blog.
Chyayla is Marathi for Damn! Shit! Christ! Terrific!, etc.
मी लहान असताना आज्जी मला छान गोष्टि सांगत असे, आज काल मराठी सिरियल च्या स्टोरी सान्गते.
(When I was small, granny would tell me nice stories. Now a days she tells stories from Marathi soaps.)
Read this blog.
Congress is an institution wrecker, says Pratab Bhanu Mehta. I love Mehta's writing -- when I understand it. Which is rare. Perhaps Express should employ a re-writer for him.
He writes here: ......weak institutions disable you from being effective mediators in social conflict. Part of what institutions do is providing authoritative mediation of facts. The state faces a crisis of credibility when it is easy to impugn the facts it produces as partisan. Under those conditions, every group feels more entitled to continue believing what they were predisposed to believing, because there is no authority they can trust.
What he means, in English, seems to be: Whenever a section of the society cries about injustice, facts have to be ascertained. Who does that? Institutions like CBI. But do we trust CBI? No, because it is reputedly a ruling party's puppet. Tytler may really be innocent with regard to 1984 Sikh riots, but CBI's credibility is so low, thanks to Congress largely, that nobody believes the clean chit given to him.
And one doesn't understand, in many cases, what were the compulsions. Absolving Quattorchi is understandable, because he was close to Gandhis. But why shield Tytler? He was a non-entity. Why send Pratibha Patil to Rashtrapati Bhavan? There were several other Congress-friendly people with bigger statures. BJP can easily accuse Patil of favouring Congress if the mandate of this election is fractured and it becomes a toss-up between UPA and NDA. Because she commands no respect.
Why Navin Chawla is made Elections boss? BJP has accused him of being Congress-partisan many times. What if BJP were to question fairness of elections conducted under Chawla? We have had criminals getting elected to Parliament, but that's not the lowest point. Lowest point for the democracy will be when losing party will dub the elections unfair.
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
Shekhar Gupta in today' Indian Express:
Now we come to our final set of certainties. First, whichever coalition comes to power, Ramadoss, Paswan, Kumaraswamy (junior Gowda) and Ajit Singh will be in its cabinet.
These fortunate men represent the phenomenon of total ideological fungibility, as they will share power with any of the three possible combinations.
They will also pretty much have their pick of what can only be described as ATM ministries. Each of these will have just a few seats, but total political mobility.
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
There is no alternative to democracy. That said, democracy sure is a strange beast.
A gunman killed 13 people in Binghamton, United States, last week. He had lost his job, and was depressed. Thousands of such people could be found the world over, thanks to recession. But in how many countries it's so easy to buy a gun?
Self-defence could be a justification for possessing arms. But a sniper rifle -- which can pierce an armour a mile away -- can be bought in certain parts of United States (Source: NYT). What do you need a sniper rifle for? To shoot robber-looking moving objects a mile away?
"Binghamton is yet another reminder of America's terrible gun problem", NYT says. But thinking Americans seem to be helpless. American constitution permits citizens to possess arms. Gun-sellers are a powerful lobby. It can sway presidential election. So a license to gun (down) anybody anytime has become a price for the American democracy.
In India, guns are hard to get, legally. But those who can wield them effectively, and escape the arms of law, can contest elections. National political parties will field them, if they are winnable. I may not like a certain Shahabuddin of Sewan. But in Sewan he (alone) is winnable, and lo! he is my lawmaker.
| Reactions: |
P.S. 2 - This blog supports Jarnail Singh, as also the brave Iraqi scribe who threw his size tenner at Bush.
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |